Does Hebrews 10:14 Support Eternal Security?

by

The 14th verse of Hebrews 10 states regarding Christ’s action directed toward believers “For by one offering he has made perfect forever those who are being consecrated”. But considering that these people are Christians, this seems to imply Christians are sanctified unendingly. If this is true, does Hebrews 10:14 give evidence for the idea that a true Christian cannot reject salvation once they become a Christian?

Hebrews Chapter 10 reads as follows:

1 Since the law has only a shadow of the good things to come, and not the very image of them, it can never make perfect those who come to worship by the same sacrifices that they offer continually each year.
2 Otherwise, would not the sacrifices have ceased to be offered, since the worshipers, once cleansed, would no longer have had any consciousness of sins?
3 But in those sacrifices there is only a yearly remembrance of sins,
4 for it is impossible that the blood of bulls and goats take away sins.
5 For this reason, when he came into the world, he said: “Sacrifice and offering you did not desire, but a body you prepared for me;
6 holocausts and sin offerings you took no delight in.
7 Then I said, ‘As is written of me in the scroll, Behold, I come to do your will, O God.'”
8 First he says, “Sacrifices and offerings, holocausts and sin offerings, you neither desired nor delighted in.” These are offered according to the law.
9 Then he says, “Behold, I come to do your will.” He takes away the first to establish the second.
10 By this “will,” we have been consecrated through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
11 Every priest stands daily at his ministry, offering frequently those same sacrifices that can never take away sins.
12 But this one offered one sacrifice for sins, and took his seat forever at the right hand of God;
13 now he waits until his enemies are made his footstool.
14 For by one offering he has made perfect forever those who are being consecrated.

This is probably one of the strongest verses in support of eternal security in the whole Bible. At face value it seems like it can only be interpreted to mean that salvation is permanent and beyond the possibility of rejection.

But what does it really mean? David deSilva, one of the brightest Evangelical scholars, argues in his commentary entitled “Perseverance in Gratitude” for a very cogent interpretation that doesn’t necessitate eternal security. The surrounding context indicates that the discussion here has the underlying concept of ritual purity. Da Silva’s book “Honor, Patronage, Kinship, and Purity: Unlocking New Testament Culture” first introduced me to a definition of this idea. Ritual purity has to do with being morally and ontologically in the correct position. Terms associated with this include common and holy, clean and unclean. Being “holy” though difficult to define exactly, roughly means existing in a way that is removed from the ordinary, involves completion or perfection, and has immense power for either danger or creativity. “Common” is the absence of these qualities. “Clean/pure” means properly related to other things of a specific place and/or time. “Unclean/polluted” means improperly related to other things of a specific place and/or time.

When Hebrews 10:14 says that those who are being made holy are perfect forever, this has 2 meanings which are compatible with each other.

1. Being made perfect forever involves being permanently morally perfected (“sanctified” to use common theological terminology) and unable to fail to be morally perfected.

2. Being made perfect forever involves permanent ritual purity (clealiness) and divine-human openness; in other words, as a result of Christ’s high-priestly sacrifice the believer’s state has been ritually perfected, making God permanently accessible and requiring no more sacrifices.

The preceding verses strongly suggest that the second meaning is primary. The contrast is as follows:

1. Levitical high priests / continual sacrifices / ineffective to expiate sins

2. Christ’s high priesthood / single permanent sacrifice / effective to expiate sins

Thus, it seems prima facie likely that Hebrews 10:14 only explicitly endorses the second interpretation. Now, because there is a distinction between having access and taking advantage of that access, this view does not entail eternal security. Even though we have been perfected in the sense of given permanent access, we are capable of refusing to take advantage of that access. And if we do refuse, it seems at least possible that this could include falling away, or losing salvation.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: